Sunday, August 28, 2005

It's a Tragic World

This morning as I was driving home from Mass, I was listening to the radio. During one of the all-too-frequent commercial breaks, I heard an add from a home DNA testing kit. The purpose of this kit was to determine whether a child was related to a man: to determine whether the men is the child's actual father. As I heard this add, I stopped to think about some of the implications. I had to wonder, what kind of sad world exists where this situation can occur, and occur frequently enough for such a product to be marketable?
Are there really than many women who are faitheless to their significant others, that many men who have casual sexual relations? In order for there to be any question as to who a child's father is, the mother would have had to have slept with multiple men in a short span of time. As in within a month or so. I look at how long it takes me to establish any kind of meaningfull relationship with somebody: the span is, at the very least, a few weeks, generally much longer. And this is just to make friends, the vast majority of whom I have absolutely no desire to be anything but friends with. But the timespan being considered here is weeks to (maybe) months. Barely enough time to even establish a relationship, let alone get to the point of having the relationship be meaningful.
These people are therefore choosing to forgo the love and skip to the sex. Now, there are plenty of people out there who wish they could do this, consequence-free. However, this is not at all a ceonsequence-free act. It is, in effect, one of the greatest acts of intimacy between two people. In committing this act so freely, people people cheapen it greatly. No other act of real love exists in a more intimate level, save to lay down one's life for one's loved ones: and this can only be done once.
The act was meant to symbolize two parts becoming one, as the two parents are joined in "making" a child, just as the act of marriage is meant to symbolize. In freeling engaging in the act for mere pleasure, people degrade the acts value, to the point where nothing special is given. Even should they find a loved one, and form a more meaningful relationship, the intimacy of sex has already been lost and would take much time to recover. What, then, is left for the person's spouse, that they can give uniquely to that person?
This, perhaps, is why the traditional family is in decline, why the divorce rate is so high, and why fewer and fewer people are actually getting married these days: so many people no linger view marriage as a sacred, special thing, but as a mere contract between two people that can and should be broken when it becomes inconvenient or "disadvantageous." It would also explain why so many people support the idea of homosexual "marriages," for when sex is merely for pleasure and marriage is just for legal benefits, both lose their true meaning, and with it, the real joy that underlies each. This loss is a tragedy that is to sad to be bearable.

5 comments:

  1. Good post. We're in a lot of trouble in this country, and although everyone seems to decry a constitutional amendment I see no other way to prevent legalization of gay marriage, and the subsequent destruction of the nuclear family and eventually our society. I know that sounds extreme, but that's how I'm seeing things develop. I worry a lot for my kids, as the world they inherit will not be a friendly place, especially to Christians.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Unfortunately, even such a constitutional ammendment may not be enough. The result would just be to use the "civil unions" loophole. Marriage by another name is still marriage.
    Even preventing homosexual "marriage" or some analogy to it doesn't come even close to solving all of society's problem in this area. We have to get rid of the no-fault divorce (or better yet, divorce period); and then there is the fact that the number of marriages per capita is falling while the number of people who are co-habitating is on the rise.
    There is, however, a small ray of hope, good news, glimpsed in that add and in general. The add assumes that there is a child for this DNA test to have relevance: he or she was not aborted. And abortions are, by-and-large, decreasing ever-so-slightly around the nation. Not enough to say that they will eliminate themselves without a ban on abortions, but better than seeing an increase in them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Agreed. No fault divorce has almost destroyed marriage, as now you don't even have to state a reason, just "I want a divorce".

    ReplyDelete
  4. I choose to read the KJV bible only because it was purified 7 times to get to that point. Meaning that the NIV, KNIV and so on are mistranslated. Remember in the Bible it says to not remove or add to the Bible? Well the NIV does it which is bad.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Um, what are you responding to biblebookworm?

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...