--1--The Triduum festivities of RCIA went off without much of a hitch (aside from a VERY busy weekend, not only for the
--2--Speaking of which, I've become a fan of the idea of a year-round catechumenate, which is unfortunately very hard to get started in any given parish which doesn't already have one. I have a plan to get one started (and it involves you, neophytes...) which I don't want to spell (or spill) out here just yet. Instead, I'd like to share a little of the basics of what I would envision this kind of thing to entail. First, RCIA is ultimately going to have the feel of a class (we even give
--3--As for Easter itself, well I certainly raised a toast to the new Catholics. I enjoyed the earlier part of the day with my friend and fellow catechist Mr Matthew Anderson. That meant a good breakfast* of sandwiches left over from the reception the night before, plus samples of orange-juice-and-vodka, followed by a the even better 21-year-old scotch (from 1982, no less!), and a cigar to celebrate life (and new life). The second part of the day my wife and I spent with our other close friends, Mr and Mrs Andrew Elster (and sons). Here is a picture from the little Easter-egg hunt we did for Nickolae and Benjamin in their front yard:
*Literally, since for us fasting runs from Good Friday until after Easter (vigil) Mass.
--4--The Gospel reading for Holy Thursday is the passage about Christ's washing His disciples feet at the Last Supper (John 13:1-15). The part about those who have bathed need only their feet washed (John 13:8-10) made me think of Baptism and repentance:
Peter said to him, "You shall never wash my feet." Jesus answered him, "If I do not wash you, you have no part in me."We are, after all, baptized but once, but we do sin again and repent and confess our sins (if we allow Jesus to wash our feet, so to speak).
Simon Peter said to him, "Lord, not my feet only but also my hands and my head!"
Jesus said to him, "He who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but he is clean all over; and you are clean, but not every one of you."
--5--Our parish does a whole-parish footwashing. I participated with my wife in that one, but since she's in the choir, I had to wait until it was effectively over (thanks, choir!). Our seminarian, Peyton, had my back (thanks buddy!), but it mean that I had to get back into the sanctuary (we do the washing in the narthex) after Mass resumed. By the way, I sat on the center aisle, at the very front of the church (thanks, RCIA). It would be just a little awkward for me to move up the aisle in the middle of Mass to get to my seat, but on the other hand I did want to return to it. Solution: waited for the ushers to move forward with the collection, which they do in a column two wide by several long, and I just fell into the end of the column. The tail of the column (where I was) ended right by me seat, so as everybody bowed at the altar, I slipped into my spot in the pews. My friend Mr Matthew Anderson, who was sitting by me, did a double take. After Mass, he remarked that it was an effective job of hiding in plain site. And that was about it for me and shenanigans for the week.
Here is an excerpt from a comment left on another site in response to my last post at IGNITUM TODAY (specifically, in response to the "expanded footnote"):
"Although others disagree and suggest the introduction of parallel universes is at least as ontologicially profligate, I’m inclined to think Mr Occam’s razor comes down on the side of not introducing something of a completely new nature (god) to our ontology."This is a gross misuse of Occam's razor (and on at least two levels). Simply put, Occam's razor tells us not to needlessly multiply entities (or variables) in a model, because if we do our models will become too complex and we will no longer understand it. Secondly, even granting the popular interpretation of Occam's razor (that we need not posit two causes where one will suffice, which is an idea that actually pre-dates Occam), he makes the implicit assumption that God is a new nature not already found in our ontology, an assumption which implies theistic personalism of some kind while ignoring classical theism.
--7--Former Senator Rick Santorum is officially out of the running for president*. Speaking of which (and this might not exactly count as "drinking with the saints"), I will drink a bit of rum to Mr Santorum's decision to bow out (or "suspend" his campaign), in honor of this logo:
should be made HHS secretary if Romney wins.
*I've been asked before which of the candidates I endorse. Well, if we could splice them all together and get the general decency and small-government side of Ron Paul, the social conservatism of Rick Santorum, the debate skills of Newt Gingrich, and the general business know-how of Mitt Romney, I'd take that. Of course, if a candidate could be made of the four, we'd more than likely get someone with the personal decency of Newt Gingrich, the social policies of Mitt Romney, the large government of Rick Santorum, and the debate skills of Ron Paul. This would be about as bad of a president as Barack Obama currently is, minus perhaps the current president's kulturkampf (which is not, incidentally, limited only to the tyrannical HHS mandate).
Seven Quick Takes Friday is hosted by Mrs Jennifer Fulwiler at her Conversion Diary blog.